Are citations in abstracts considered bad style?

  • I'd like to know your opinion on citations in abstracts. At my university, there is no rule on that matter so it's basically a question of preference.

    Do you think it's okay to have citations in an abstract or do you personally prefer to have the abstract be a ``stand-alone'' piece of work?

  • aeismail

    aeismail Correct answer

    8 years ago

    It is not entirely unreasonable to include a citation in an abstract, if the reason you are citing it is because your paper is a major extension, rebuttal, or counterpoint to the cited article.

    In that case, however, you do have the responsibility of providing the reference within the body of the abstract. For example,

    We extend upon the results of Smith [Journal of Very Important Results, 1, 374 (2012)] to include the effects of a doohickey at the end of the thingamajig.

    In such a case, the abstract remains self-contained, with an important citation included. (This is especially essential if an author is well-known for multiple papers, in which case the reference can be used to distinguish the varous works that could be intended.)

    Large numbers of citations, however, should be avoided, as should "secondary" citations. Only the most critical literature for a paper should be cited, and that should normally be limited to one or two. Any more than that, and the abstract becomes hard to read.

    I like the Journal of Very Important Results. It's seems to contain many important results.

    I'll submit to that journal if I find a very important result some day.

    Why does an author "*have the responsibility* of providing the reference within the body of the abstract"? That's what the list of references at the end of the paper is for. This list of references is typically freely available with the abstract, so anyone reading the abstract would be able to find the reference. Is your claim based on a specific journal?

    @jvriesem: How would you do that, exactly? If the journal uses numbered references, you need to have access to the paper to figure out what reference is meant. I don't want to have to dig through dozens or hundreds of references to figure it out. Making it explicit saves everybody time and effort and, as I said, keeps the abstract self-contained. You shouldn't need to have the paper if you're citing a work in the abstract.

    An additional note is if you are submitting an abstract to a conference, you won't have a list of references for readers to go through separately.

License under CC-BY-SA with attribution

Content dated before 6/26/2020 9:53 AM